Judge halts Biden’s ‘unconstitutional’ $4BN program to pay up to 120% of black, Hispanic, Asian or Native American farmers’

A federal judge has halted Joe Biden‘s ‘unconstitutional’ $4 billion program to pay up to 120 percent of black, Hispanic, Asian or Native American farmers’ debt, after 12 white farmers sued claiming it discriminated against them. 

Wisconsin Judge William Griesbach issued a temporary restraining order Thursday blocking the loan forgiveness program Biden put in place after saying he wanted to tackle longstanding inequalities for farmers of color. 

Judge Griesbach said the plan failed to provide adequate examples of recent hardships imposed on farmers from minority backgrounds. He also claimed that in trying to end one type of discrimination, the program ended up creating another.  

Biden’s $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan set aside $4 billion to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) for loan forgiveness for socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers.

The money would be used to pay up to 120 percent of direct or guaranteed farm loan balances for black, American Indian, Hispanic, Asian American or Pacific Islander farmers.  

A group of 12 farmers from nine states filed a lawsuit against the USDA in April alleging the program exempts white farmers and is a violation of their constitutional rights.

Griesbach sided with the white farmers Thursday temporarily halting the USDA from proceeding with the loan relief payments and saying the ‘race-based criteria’ is a violation of equal rights.

He said the lawsuit is ‘likely to succeed on the merits of their claim’ that the program’s ‘use of race-based criteria in the administration of the program violates their right to equal protection under the law.’ 

The USDA has identified ‘socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher’ to mean farmers ‘who are one or more of the following: Black/African American, American Indian, Alaskan native, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, or Pacific Islander,’ the judge noted

The agency does not actually consider, he ruled, ‘the financial circumstances of the applicant.’  

Griesbach also said there was ‘no evidence of intentional discrimination’ of minority farmers in recent government assistance.

‘Aside from a summary of statistical disparities, defendants have no evidence of intentional discrimination by the USDA in the implementation of the recent agriculture subsidies and pandemic relief efforts,’ he wrote.  

The judge said the program discriminates against one group in an attempt to tackle discrimination against another. Continue at Daily Mail

OPINION: We invite your written comments below.

AND/OR: What do you think? Call 410 656-1123 we will try to use your comments in our next broadcast:

 
(Visited 243 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *